Insight · Behavioral Health

42 CFR Part 2 after the 2024 final rule: what SUD programs and their partners must do now

The compliance date has passed and OCR is taking complaints. Here is what changed for substance use disorder records, who it reaches beyond the treatment program, and what to check in your consents, notices, systems, and contracts.

By Thomas J. Johnson, Founder, EHR Resources LLC October 18, 2026 8 minute read

The short version

  • Part 2 protects substance use disorder (SUD) records from federally assisted programs, and its limits follow those records to the covered entities, business associates, and other lawful holders who receive them.
  • The final rule was published February 16, 2024, took effect April 16, 2024, and required compliance by February 16, 2026.
  • A patient can now sign one consent for treatment, payment, and health care operations. Covered entities and business associates that receive records under it may redisclose them as HIPAA allows, but the records still cannot be used against the patient in legal proceedings without consent or a court order.
  • HIPAA's breach notification requirements and civil penalty structure now apply to Part 2 records, and OCR began accepting Part 2 complaints and breach reports on February 16, 2026.
  • Consent forms, privacy notices, EHR handling, business associate agreements, breach procedures, training, and the security risk analysis all deserve a fresh look.

For decades, 42 CFR Part 2 ran on its own track, with consent rules stricter than HIPAA and very little enforcement. The 2024 final rule moved it much closer to HIPAA, and as of February 16, 2026, the new rules are in force with a federal enforcement program behind them. If your organization treats substance use disorders, or receives records from a program that does, this is worth a careful review.

What Part 2 is and who it reaches

Part 2 is the federal regulation that protects the confidentiality of SUD patient records, based on the statute at 42 U.S.C. 290dd-2. It applies to a "Part 2 program," meaning a federally assisted program that holds itself out as providing, and provides, SUD diagnosis, treatment, or referral for treatment.

Both parts of that definition are broader than many people assume. Under 42 CFR 2.12, a program is federally assisted if, among other things, it participates in Medicare, holds a DEA registration to dispense controlled substances used to treat SUD, receives federal financial assistance in any form, or has tax-exempt status. And a "program" can be an identified SUD unit inside a general hospital, or staff in a general medical facility whose primary function is providing SUD services, not only a freestanding treatment center.

The rule also travels with the records. A "lawful holder" is anyone who receives Part 2 records through patient consent or one of the regulation's exceptions, and many of Part 2's restrictions apply to them. In practice that can include hospitals, primary care practices, health plans, qualified service organizations, and the vendors that host or process these records.

The 2024 final rule and its dates

Section 3221 of the CARES Act, passed in 2020, directed HHS to align Part 2 more closely with HIPAA. HHS, through OCR and SAMHSA, implemented it in the final rule Confidentiality of Substance Use Disorder (SUD) Patient Records, published in the Federal Register on February 16, 2024 (89 FR 12472). The rule took effect April 16, 2024, and anyone subject to it had to comply by February 16, 2026.

What changed

A single consent for treatment, payment, and health care operations. A patient can now give one written consent covering all future uses and disclosures for treatment, payment, and health care operations. Before, programs often needed separate, narrow consents for each recipient and purpose.

Redisclosure under HIPAA. HIPAA covered entities and business associates that receive Part 2 records under that consent may redisclose them as the HIPAA Privacy Rule permits. Part 2 programs that are not covered entities still redisclose only within the scope of the consent. Each consent-based disclosure must carry the required Part 2 notice statement, along with a copy of the consent or a clear explanation of its scope, under 42 CFR 2.32.

No segregation requirement. The rule says outright that a Part 2 program, covered entity, or business associate receiving records under a single TPO consent is not required to segregate or segment them. That is a relief for EHR design, but it does not remove the need to know where the records are and what consent covers them.

SUD counseling notes. The rule creates a new category, similar to HIPAA psychotherapy notes: notes recorded by a Part 2 program provider who is an SUD or mental health professional, documenting or analyzing a private or group counseling session, and kept separate from the rest of the record. They require their own specific consent and cannot be disclosed under a general TPO consent. Medication, session times, treatment modalities, and similar items are excluded from the definition.

Protection in legal proceedings. Without the patient's consent or a court order that meets Part 2's requirements, records and testimony about them cannot be used against the patient in civil, criminal, administrative, or legislative proceedings. Consent for use in a proceeding cannot be combined with consent for any other purpose. Investigative agencies get limited protection from liability if they act with reasonable diligence, which includes checking SAMHSA's treatment facility locator and the provider's privacy notice before requesting records.

Breach notification. The HIPAA Breach Notification Rule now applies to breaches of unsecured Part 2 records in the same way it applies to protected health information. That means notifying affected patients, HHS, and in larger breaches the media. HHS's breach reporting page now accepts Part 2 breach reports through the same portal used for HIPAA.

Penalties and enforcement. Part 2 violations are now subject to the same civil and criminal penalties that apply under HIPAA, and HHS applies its HIPAA enforcement procedures to Part 2. In August 2025, HHS delegated authority to administer and enforce Part 2 to the OCR Director, with the delegation notice published August 27, 2025.

Patient notice. The Part 2 patient notice now lines up with the HIPAA Notice of Privacy Practices, and patients gain new rights, including the right to request restrictions on certain disclosures. A separate HIPAA rule finalized in 2024 also required covered entities that create, receive, or maintain Part 2 records to add SUD record information to their own privacy notices. A federal court in Texas vacated most of that rule in June 2025, but the Part 2 notice provisions were not vacated and carried the same February 16, 2026 compliance date.

Complaints. Patients may now file a Part 2 complaint directly with HHS, as well as with the program. Programs may not retaliate against a patient for filing, and they need complaint procedures that track the HIPAA requirements.

What has happened since February 16, 2026

On February 13, 2026, HHS announced a civil enforcement program for Part 2. Starting February 16, OCR began accepting complaints alleging Part 2 violations and notifications of breaches of SUD records. OCR said investigations may end in resolution agreements, monetary settlements, corrective action commitments, or civil money penalties.

OCR also published an updated model HIPAA Notice of Privacy Practices and a model Part 2 Patient Notice in February 2026. A Part 2 program that is also a covered entity may use one combined notice that meets both sets of requirements.

On September 29, 2026, OCR issued an FAQ on when Part 2 allows state Medicaid agencies to use SUD records to verify exclusions from the Medicaid community engagement requirement. It is narrow, but it confirms OCR is now interpreting Part 2 as its own program. The current list of resources is on OCR's Part 2 page.

What to check now

Whether you run a behavioral health program, a hospital with an SUD unit, or a vendor that touches these records, these are the areas to review:

Start with a records map. Before revising forms, write down where Part 2 records are created, where they are stored, which systems and vendors receive them, and under what consent. Most of the other items on this list depend on that picture, and it is the same inventory a security risk analysis needs.

Include Part 2 records in your risk analysis

Part 2 requires programs to maintain formal policies and procedures to protect records, paper and electronic, against unauthorized use and disclosure. For covered entities and business associates, SUD records in their systems are also electronic protected health information under the HIPAA Security Rule. Now that breaches of these records are reportable and enforceable, they belong in your security risk analysis by name: which systems hold them, which vendors can reach them, and what would happen if they were exposed.

EHR Resources can help with each piece: a HIPAA security risk analysis that accounts for Part 2 data flows, updates to policies, consent forms, and notices, and staff training on the new rules. If your organization has not reviewed Part 2 since the compliance date, now is a good time to do it, before a complaint or a breach makes the decision for you.

Thomas J. Johnson
About the author

Thomas J. Johnson, Founder, EHR Resources LLC

Thomas founded EHR Resources in 2011 after three years helping more than 1,400 practices adopt electronic health records under the Meaningful Use program. He served on a national HHS working group that developed guidance for covered entities conducting their own security risk analyses, and has spent the years since conducting them. Read his message to prospective clients or browse more articles.

Have a question this didn't answer?

A short conversation about where you stand is free and confidential. You will speak with Thomas directly, and there is no obligation on the other side.

Request a consultation